Press Release by ANCC, 29 March 2009
In a democratic country, such as Canada, it is fair play in politics to promote any organisation or political party short of misrepresentation when national interests are at stake. Unfortunately, that civic obligation is not honoured, and it is a commonplace phenomenon to see pronouncements where there is an implied message that the authors represent the whole community or its majority. Readers are reminded of this concern while reviewing ANCC’s most recent press release of 29 March 2009 copied at the end of this posting.
Press Release by ANCC, 29 March 2009
In a democratic country, such as Canada, it is fair play in politics to promote any organisation or political party short of misrepresentation when national interests are at stake. Unfortunately, that civic obligation is not honoured, and it is a commonplace phenomenon to see pronouncements where there is an implied message that the authors represent the whole community or its majority. Readers are reminded of this concern while reviewing ANCC’s most recent press release of 29 March 2009 copied at the end of this posting.
Keghart.com contacted some friends who are active in the community and are aware of the ins and outs soliciting their comments. Below are some points that the readers may take into consideration.
* The event is certainly a positive one as more and more parliamentarians become aware of Armenian issues. Nevertheless, that’s where the whole show stops. In the past, many organizations – including the AGBU – have worked hard to create this awareness and expand the group.
Armenian National Committee of CanadaComité National Arménien du Canada130 Albert St., Suite/Bureau 1007Ottawa, ONKIP 5G4
10 comments
Some points to ponder about the above comments
I read the above comments and related press release with some amusement. As the saying goes, it would have been comic if it weren't tragic.
Just a few points that I feel should be rectified:
I'm very well aware of the issues the Laval community faced when Mme Folco was pitted against an Armenian candidate in the last elections. Fortunately, the "odars" have a much broader view than us when dealing with electoral partisanship. The elections are history and life follows its course. But to say that " Thanks to non-ANCC committed friends, she has put aside that episode" is more than twisting the truth. The ANCC did more than its fair share to mend the somewhat twisted relations with Mme Folco. In fact, even during the elections, the ANCC had sent some members to work for her campaign.
I would also like to remind Mr. Alepian that the issue of separating church and politics was resolved 150 years ago, at least for the Western Armenians. The fact that he keeps seeing everything through the Etchmiadznagan-Antiliasagan filter only means that the organisation he claims to represent is nothing more than a backward looking social club longing for the good-old-days and has nothing to do in the political arena. He, of all people, should think more than once before throwing around his lies and half truths. People have not yet forgotten that when the Montreal community was fighting for the erection of the Genocide monument, many corporations were lobbying actively against us for the sake of their business interests in Turkey, including one corporation where he held a high position (VP or something equally pompous). If he's half-serious about politics, he should know that any Ottawa event is a political one, not a social affair, and he should not expect invitations for the many family-business type of organisations that his claimed list of "20 major Armenian organizations from across Canada" is composed of.
By the way, I heard that Mr. Alepian and his Congress intend to honour the former MP, Mr Sarkis Assadourian, during their event. Before going further into the nice words that will most certainly be said during the event, Mr Alepian should ask Mr. Assadourian about his vote on the Armenian Genocide bill of 1996 […], when the Chretien government forced the removal of the G word, and replaced it with the word Tragedy. I remember very well that Mr. Assadourian VOTED FOR THE REMOVAL of the word, while he could have, despite all the rigours of party discipline, very understandably abstained. He also could have left the Chamber and not participate in the vote. He did none of the above and shamefully voted for the removal of the word Genocide.
Viken Who? Let the Public be the Judge
In response to Viken, who has "neglected" to divulge his full name, I would like to make the following remarks:
At the time that the private member's bill was introduced, the matter was handled not by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but by the Ministry of Justice. The Honourable Minister informed me that the government would oppose the motion. When I asked why, I received the following answer, "We don't want any bombs and killings in our Capital and we don't want to provide any excuses." It was clear that the motion would be defeated.
Under those circumstances I tried at least to save something for the community. Instead of defeating the whole motion, through hard negotiations on my part, and with the agreement of Robert Mills MP, it was possible to have a compromise solution to the effect of dedicating a week of Remembrance covering the period April 20 – April 27; that assured inclusion of APRIL 24.
Following the motions, deliberations and voting in the parliament, the representatives of ARF – the Armenian Revolutionary Federation – sometimes mediated by ANCC- were in Ottawa. I explained to them what had transpired. They were happy with the compromise and the reasoning related to terrorism furnished by the government. Moreover, the ARF leaders were so satisfied with my stand that they decided to support me in the following election of 1997. Later, in the same year, they asked for my help to arrange meetings with political leaders in Ottawa for their church leader – The Catholicos of Cilicia – having failed to do so themselves. Additionally, they supported my son's candidacy for city council.
The record is out there in the public domain regarding my tenure as the first and very proud Canadian-Armenian member of the House of Commons of Canada from October 1993 to June 2004. That includes the period of April 2004, when the House passed the resolution recognizing The Genocide of the Armenians. It was accomplished through an initial phase of compromises and teamwork, eventually garnering the support of all parties.
Similarly, my record as Citizenship Court Judge is available.
My suggestion to Viken, his likes, their cohorts and comrades is to look at those records and not misrepresent the issues. I am ready to meet him, his followers and leaders in any public forum, in the court of public opinion or in the court of law.
Sarkis Assadourian
Former member of Parliament of Canada
Time to Honor!
Instead of honoring our people in the public domain, we like to badmouth them. Reading Sarkis Assadourian’s reply to Viken I feel ashamed that the work done by this parliamentarian is not only unappreciated, but thrown into the garbage. No wonder young Armenians have alienated themselves from the traditional Armenian political parties. Who loses?
Nanor – Springfield
Ապրիս՛ Նանոր
Ապրիս՛ Նանոր,
Sometimes in order to appreciate and understand someone in the true sense, we have to 'depart' ourselves from the parties that we belong to.
Almost all Armenians who are fanatically attached to their political parties, unfortunately are detached from feeling and being Armenian!
Also we have to look at the whole picture from all angles and never judge something or someone from what 'others' are saying…
Time out!
Time out!
Deleted Comments
It is much appreciated and encouraged receiving comments. Some are deleted because they contain inuendos and qualifiers about persons and do not address issues.
Respectfully,
Dikran Abrahamian
Sarkis Assadourian
In 1996, I was also very angry with Sarkis Assadourian, whom I personaly knew from Hay Getron in Toronto, I would have chosen to loose my seat rather than give up the Genocide word for Tragedy. I was then and I am now a card carrying Liberal in a province like Alberta, but I tip my hat to Steven Harper in this regard.
Vrejouhy Atikian
Calgary, AB
Just for the record
While this issue has been garnering a lot of rightful attention and indignation from many sides, I would like hereby to clearly and unequivocally state that I am NOT the Viken who posted the comment in question, to which Sarkis Assadourian has replied.
I know that many are already aware of this, but many are also not. I have been receiving personal emails "questioning" me for my said "position". You should know by now that any piece I write and/or post bears my name in full, i.e. Viken L. Attarian or rarely my initials VLA. A simple Google with my name will show numerous comments on forums that I write on and the signature that follows.
While I do not know who the Viken in question is, I would not want to be confused with him or her (as it could be an alias), nor I am sure he would want to be confused with me.
The least thing we now need is a "Comedy of Errors". Like all humans, we already lead a tragi-comic existence.
Viken L. Attarian
Let’s move forward
This posting, complaints and counter-complaints illustrate one important sore aspect of our community life. Although all of us, or at least those who are interested in our community’s major activities, share the same goals, we hardly see each other eye to eye.
Sadly, no constructive criticism has been heard. We know what’s wrong, but how to improve the situation, how to move forward is missing. May be a step at a time is necessary, regardless of how miniscule that is.
Does anyone have a suggestion?
Shavarsh
Jealousy is a brute force
Whoever this Viken is does not matter. It is obvious that some people out of envy or plain meanness will stoop very low to throw cheap shots right and left. Politics is the art of the possible, of compromises and strategic retreat to fight another day. Our history of the last century is full of literary people who thought they could be political leaders, but missed golden opportunities for the nation.
Sarkis Assadourian deservingly should be proud of his accomplishments. Most people, no matter which sector of the community they come from, agree. Some will never accept that he accomplished a lot by his political smarts and determination. They will always pretend that only an organization’s support got him the accolades. A few others tried to follow his example but got nowhere.
It is not surprising that former Prime Minister Jean Chretien liked him and appreciated his work, because he saw in him his own image: smart, tough and underestimated.
Incidentally, in addition to other positions Mr. Assadourian was the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration for a while.
Jealousy is a brute force. It devours the holder rather than the target.
Comments are closed.