“It’s Not Over Until It’s Over”

Photo: Greenblatt (L) and Foxman (R)

David Boyajian, Massachusetts, Veterans Today, 18 May 2016                         

In mid-May, on the Anti-Defamation League’s “blog,” CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said that the ADL now “unequivocally” acknowledges the Armenian Genocide committed by Turkey. Curiously, he doesn’t mention Turkey.  The ADL, he added, “would support U.S. acknowledgment of the Armenian Genocide.”

It’s surprising that such a serious subject would only be “blogged.”  But let that go.

For decades the ADL has been colluding with Turkey to defeat Armenian Genocide resolutions in the U.S. Congress and to avoid acknowledging that genocide.  For an organization that loudly espouses human rights and insists on Holocaust recognition and legislation, the hypocrisy has been breathtaking.

Just imagine the ADL’s reaction had some Armenian American organization questioned the Holocaust and lobbied against Holocaust-related legislation.

Jewish and Israeli media have long candidly conceded that Turkey, Israel, the ADL, and groups such as the American Jewish Committee, B’nai B’rith, AIPAC, and others had mutually agreed to help Turkey stop U.S. acknowledgment of the Armenian Genocide.  See NoPlaceForDenial.com, “Press Kit.”

Consider Yola Habif Johnston, a director at JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs).   In 2006 she explained that for over 15 years “the Jewish lobby has quite actively supported Turkey in their efforts to prevent the so-called Armenian genocide resolution from passing.”

The general public became aware of the ADL’s hypocrisy in the summer of 2007.  As a result, over a dozen Massachusetts cities – including Arlington, Belmont, Medford, Newburyport, Newton, Northampton, Peabody, Somerville, and Watertown – cut ties with ADL “anti-bias” programs such as “No Place for Hate.” So did the Massachusetts Municipal Association, which represents every city and town.

Human rights advocates and many principled Jewish Americans and Israelis blasted the ADL. They also rejected ADL National Director Abraham Foxman’s ambiguous statement that what happened to Armenians was merely “tantamount” to genocide. Hundreds of editorials and articles nationwide and around the world exposed the ADL.

But New England Regional Director Andrew Tarsy soon recognized the Armenian Genocide.  Foxman immediately fired him.  Tarsy was rehired, but later resigned.  He has since criticized the ADL.  Greenblatt’s recent statement, says Tarsy, should have gone further: “Assets, land, money, family heirlooms … everything that Holocaust reparations has represented … should be on the table” for Armenians too.

In 2007 Foxman arrogantly declared that the Armenian genocide doesn’t belong “in the U.S. Congress or the parliament of any other country.”  Yet Canada, France, Switzerland, Uruguay, the Vatican, a UN sub-commission, the World Council of Churches, the European Union Parliament, and many more have all acknowledged the Armenian Genocide.  What brought about the ADL’s seeming reversal?

Newton, Massachusetts School Superintendent David Fleishman recently began sending students to an ADL “social justice” program.  Hired in 2010, perhaps he was unaware that Newton had ceased its affiliation with the ADL three years earlier.

After reading about this in March, I contacted Armenian American organizations and individuals.  Newton Mayor Setti Warren and many of the city’s citizens and officials were made aware that Newton was breaking its 2007 promise.

Only under renewed pressure and unwanted scrutiny did the ADL and Greenblatt issue their May “blog” post.  Greenblatt’s statement that “We would support U.S. recognition of the Armenian Genocide” is a bit suspicious, however, given the ADL’s past word games. Why not “do support” or “will support” rather than “would support”?

Moreover, the official Armenian American website NoPlaceForDenial.com has long contained this demand: “The ADL must support U.S. affirmation of the Armenian Genocide, as it does with the Holocaust.

In partial atonement, will the ADL lobby as hard for the Armenian Genocide resolution as it has for Holocaust legislation?  Highly doubtful.  Sadly, two American organizations — the Armenian Assembly of America and the Armenian National Committee of America – have taken the ADL’s bait.   But many Armenian Americans have not.  They’re protesting the obvious sellout.

While the ADL claims to be concerned with human rights and genocide, it has for decades consciously and grievously hurt not only the Christian Armenian people but also the cause of genocide recognition and prevention.

The ADL, therefore, also owes an explicit public apology to Armenians and human rights and genocide prevention organizations.  In 2007, Abraham Foxman did apologize, but not to Armenians.  He apologized to Turkey because the publicity surrounding the ADL – Turkey collusion had embarrassed that country.

The ADL must also make public the agreements and documents that created and sustained the genocide denial pact among itself, Turkey, and Israel.

Other organizations, including B’nai B’rith and the American Jewish Committee (which has since apparently accepted the factuality of the Armenian genocide and claimed it would support a Congressional resolution on it) should do the same.  They owe it to the American people and their consciences.

As Yogi Berra, the late, great New York Yankees catcher, famously noted, “It Ain’t Over till It’s Over.”

The author is an Armenian American freelance journalist. Many of his articles are archived at Armeniapedia.org

  1. ADL is Playing Politics

    This is an excellent mini-report  on how politics can subjugate moral systems.

    The author is a long time indefatigable  fighter for honesty, justice,  and ethical steadfastness in dealing with  such solemn matters as the Turkish Genocide of the Armenians. 

    While the Armenian Genocide is recognized as such world wide by many countries and organizations, two crucial states, namely   the United States and Israel adamantly  refrain from acknowledging the mass extermination of Armenians as a "Genocide".

    The reason for this  reluctance is that for both countries, moral considerations are superseded by political expediency. It is claimed that "national interests" prohibit the two states from vexing the sensitivities of the Turkish government. 

    The question arises.  If  these are immutable realities, why do various Armenian  organizations leave the issue of the Genocide hostage to an appropriate recognition by the United States and Israel, (including the friends of Israel such as ADL)?  Is it not time for a strategic rethinking?

  2. Fourth Broken Record


    You rightly ask: "Why do various Armenian  organizations leave the issue of the Genocide hostage to an appropriate recognition by the United States and Israel, (including the friends of Israel such as ADL)?  Is it not time for a strategic rethinking?"

    My question to you is:  "Do you have a suggestion for this strategic rethinking?"  I ask this with absolute honesty.

    Thank you,


    1. Let us Focus on Daunting Challenges


      My point is that while  the fight for the recognition of the Armenian Genocide is a meritorious endeavor, investing super energies on  unrealistic objectives and expectations in the struggle is not  a wise orientation. It squanders  scarce resources.  It may also result in profound disappointments and mete a terrible blow   to the Armenian psyche.  After all, those who are recruiting our efforts for the cause should be cognizant of safeguarding the dignity and pride of the Armenians in all their activities.

      At this juncture in their history, the Armenian people face daunting challenges both in the homeland and the Diaspora. The cause of the recognition of the Armenian genocide  should not be pursued at the expense of those challenges.

      1. Daunting challenges

        Dear Armen,

        It goes without saying that I agree with you.

        I asked my question to stimulate an answer such as:  "let's focus instead on this, or on that".  I was then going to take whichever line you proposed to its end and see, with you, whether it could really be achieved in satisfactory fashion without first achieving proper inclusive democracy in Armenia.



Comments are closed.

You May Also Like